Has the Golden Age of Private Credit Lost its Shine?

Executive Summary:
- Private credit investors are positioned to experience higher yields for longer.
- A significant funding gap exists between the amount of buyout dry powder and credit origination dry powder, suggesting a supply-demand imbalance.
- Private credit has demonstrated positive vintage year IRR for the past 23 years and has historically outperformed its public market equivalent.
- Defaults remain inside the long-term average.
Amidst an evolving market backdrop, some investors are debating whether the golden age of private credit may be changing. We believe it will continue, and the data suggests that private credit has reason to continue delivering its consistency of performance and attractive yields in a higher-for-longer rate environment.
Higher for longer
Despite three rate cuts in 2024, private credit investors are well-positioned to experience higher yields for longer, which suggests the golden age has room to run and investors have not missed the opportunity. Where this is most evident is in the forward SOFR curve, which is U.S. private credit’s typical reference rate. Looking ahead, private credit investors are poised to benefit from 200 - 300 basis points (bps) of enhanced floating yield, relative to the decade preceding 2022’s rising interest rate environment (see the chart below).
Looking at the chart below, as of March 20, 2025, the 3-month term SOFR was 431 bps with a forward target between approximately 3.6% and 4.1% over the next decade. If we compare that to the 3-month LIBOR in the decade preceding 2022, it averaged less than 1%, leading to a reliance on the typical LIBOR floor of 1% for private credit deals during that period. The difference between the forward SOFR curve and historical LIBOR is where we expect investors will enjoy more floating yield.
Rates Predicted to Stay Higher For Longer
3-Month SOFR Forward Curve1
Looking through the lens of the leveraged loan index paints a similar picture. The yield to maturity (YTM) for leveraged loans averaged 5.52% over the decade leading up to 2022’s rising rate environment. From 2022 to 2024, the average YTM was 9.56%, up 73% over the prior decade. And while the YTM softened from 2023 to 2024, particularly as spreads tightened, we anticipate leveraged loans overall will benefit from a higher-for-longer rate environment. For context, weighted average nominal spreads were ~341 bps across the leveraged loan market in 2024 against a long-term average of ~348 bps. Based on recent market volatility, large U.S. banks are forecasting credit spreads to widen by as much as 200 basis points by Q2 2025.
Yield to Maturity - Leveraged Loan Index
Long-term Leveraged Loan Spreads
From a policy perspective, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has two objectives: to achieve maximum employment, and an inflation target of 2%. In support of its goals, the FOMC concluded to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 4.25-4.5% during its March 2025 meeting. Reflecting on the Fed’s December 14, 2024 meeting, the rate cut was accompanied by FOMC member forecasts, which reflected expectations for fewer and slower additional Fed interest rate cuts through the end of 2025, 2026 and 2027 than the FOMC forecasted on September 18, 2024.1 Compared to September figures, median forecasts of interest rates were raised to 3.9% for the end of 2025, up from 3.4%, and 3.4% for the end of 2026, up from 2.9%.2 Yet another higher-for-longer data point.
While these are simply forecasts, the velocity of rate changes will ultimately be influenced by various factors. The Fed will likely ease policy more slowly if inflation remains elevated. Some of the negative forces on inflation include tariffs and immigration policy, supply chain disruption caused by geopolitical events, stronger-than-expected household spending and persistent housing cost increases. On the other hand, policy easing could take place more rapidly if labor market conditions deteriorate, economic activity weakens or if inflation returns to 2% more quickly than anticipated. Regardless of the velocity of rate changes, what the FOMC forecasts have made clear is that interest rates will remain elevated.
Credit tailwinds: Demand exceeds supply
Private Markets Fundraising
Trailing Three-Year Private Markets Fundraising
By Strategy
While global private markets fundraising saw a third consecutive year of decline in 2024, private credit fundraising as a percentage of total private markets fundraising was up slightly from 2023 to 2024 and evergreen fund growth also expanded over that period. Not only is this trend seen in the data, but it is felt by investors globally as they are dizzy with choice. Having distributed my time across five continents in 2024, investors consistently asked me, “Is private credit too crowded? Is too much money being raised?” I often responded in a respectful, convivial way: “Unequivocally, no. Take a breath with me and let’s look at the fundamentals.” As of Q3 2024 there was a $1.4 trillion funding gap between the amount of private equity buyout dry powder raised and the amount of credit origination dry powder raised. If we marry that figure to a growing maturity wall of over $600 billion in performing loans through 2028, we estimate that there is comfortably a $2 trillion funding gap over that period.
Buyout Credit Financing Demand
In Billions
Maturity Breakdown of Performing Loans
In Billions
I know what you are thinking: "Won’t the banks fill that gap?" It's unlikely, and for two reasons. First, bank regulation following the global financial crisis (GFC) helped to accelerate market share gains by non-bank lenders, a trend that was already underway. Look at the count of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) financed in private credit versus the broadly syndicated market over the past 5-6 years. Private credit execution has meaningfully outpaced bank-led LBO financing. In the near-term, it’s also worth acknowledging that “Liberation Day” has led to market volatility, which could open the possibility for a renewed bank retrenchment as we saw in 2022.
Count of LBOs Financed in Private Credit vs BSL Market
Secondly, private credit can offer borrowers numerous benefits over public financing alternatives, despite being more costly. Some of those benefits include:
- Closer relationships: The ability of a small lender group to work collaboratively and efficiently with their borrower on incremental facilities and amendments.
- Speed of execution: The ability to provide financing in a short period of time.
- Greater financing certainty: Public markets may shut down during periods of volatility while private credit typically remains open due to its committed capital nature.
- Ability to understand complexity: Public markets are not always receptive to transaction complexity, including business carve-outs and divestitures.
- Stricter confidentiality: The ability to limit access of sensitive information to a small private lender group vs. sharing it more broadly in the public markets.
Consistency of performance: Steady returns across market cycles
Bank regulation isn’t the only reason private credit continues to proliferate. Performance is a large contributor. Private credit has demonstrated positive vintage year IRR in every year for the past 23 years and has historically outperformed the Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index (a public market equivalent) in every vintage year. Pause and think about that. The asset class has experienced three recessions over that period. And not only has it demonstrated consistent performance over long periods, but it has also done so with the narrowest spread of returns in up and down markets relative to other private markets assets. It makes you wonder if private credit is simply the golden asset class. Forget ages.
Credit IRR vs PME by Vintage Year
Spread of Returns by Down and Up Markets2
And if you still aren’t convinced, just look at the five-year annualized low point. Private credit historically has the highest performance relative to public and private alternatives. This is one of the many reasons we view private credit as an all-weather strategy.
Lowest 5-Year Annualized Performance
Defaults
2022 ushered in concerns of a credit default cycle on the heels of what was a rapidly rising interest rate environment. Many investors wondered if borrowers could support elevated interest expenses, particularly those who had borrowed floating rate debt in a zero-interest rate environment. To give readers a sense of the impact of rising rates, a term loan priced at S+500 in 2021 would have cost a borrower 6% in annual interest expense using a 1% SOFR floor. Today, that same loan costs 9.3% in interest expense, which is an increase of 55% based on 3-month SOFR as of March 20, 2025.
Despite expectations for elevated defaults, leverage loan default rates have remained below their 25-year average of 2.43% by issuer count. As of March 2025, the last twelve months (LTM) default rate was 1.23%. A strong consumer driven by higher levels of employment has been among the contributing factors. Including distressed exchanges, the leverage loan default rate is slightly higher at 4.31% by number of issuers.
Finally, the March 31, 2025 distressed ratio was 4.5%, by issuer count, which is inside of the 10-year average of 5.4% (and inside the 20-year average of ~7.5%). The distressed ratio is the ratio of loans trading below 80 cents on the dollar relative to the total number of loans. Historically, the distressed ratio has been a leading indicator of future default activity.
U.S. Leveraged Loan Default Rate
U.S. Leveraged Loan Distressed Ratio
Looking ahead
Uncertainty abounds, particularly as the world comes to grips with tariffs. The uncertainty driven by trade tensions is likely to lead to a deterioration in business and consumer sentiment, a weaker labor market and open the door to recession risk. Investors will seek safety and strategies like senior direct lending will offer safe harbor. Macroeconomic uncertainty is also likely to be accompanied by a widening spread environment, which will benefit private credit investors as it did in 2022.
Amidst this uncertainty, we anticipate that private markets transaction activity could slow; however, we are optimistic private credit will maintain certain deal flow drivers. Companies will still demand incremental facilities and recapitalizations, and a large maturity wall remains, which will demand fresh credit capital. Limited Partners also remain liquidity starved as hold periods have gotten longer. On average, +67% of buyout deals exited in 2024 were held for more than five years. Also, private markets distribution activity in 2024 remained well below the long-term average of 23%. This is likely to pressure buyout GPs to find creative ways to deliver liquidity, which could usher in a wave of transaction types ranging from continuation vehicles to GP financing solutions, which private credit is well-suited to support.
It is also worth reflecting on how the broadly syndicated markets respond to volatility. Not well. These periods of bank retrenchment are when private credit tends to shine. 2022’s rising rate environment is a good near-term example. Banks sat on the sidelines while private credit providers enjoyed higher spreads, stronger covenant protection and lender-friendly credit documentation.
Holding Period of Exited Buyout Deals
% of Deal Count by Year of Exit
Distributions
Annual Private Markets Distributions
With various unknowns, credit selection discipline will continue to be paramount, and lenders will adapt to the changing landscape. They will likely deprioritize companies with globally dependent supply chains, while emphasizing cycle-resistant capital structures, and many will gravitate to seniority and collateral protection. For nearly a quarter century, private credit has demonstrated positive and consistent performance through multiple market cycles and proven itself as an all-weather strategy. There is no reason to believe this time is different.
Corporate Finance/Buyout – Any PM fund that generally takes control position by buying a company.
Credit – This strategy focuses on providing debt capital.
PME (Public Market Equivalent) – Calculated by taking the fund cash flows and investing them in a relevant index. The fund cash flows are pooled such that capital calls are simulated as index share purchases and distributions as index share sales. Contributions are scaled by a factor such that the ending portfolio balance is equal to the private equity net asset value (equal ending exposures for both portfolios). This seeks to prevent shorting of the public market equivalent portfolio. Distributions are not scaled by this factor. The IRR is calculated based off of these adjusted cash flows.
Venture Capital – Venture Capital incudes any PM fund focused on financing startups, early-stage, late stage, and emerging companies or a combination of multiple investment stages of startups.
Real Estate – Any closed-end fund that primarily invests in non-core real estate, excluding separate accounts and joint ventures.
Private Equity – A broad term used to describe any fund that offers equity capital to private companies.
Real Assets – Real Assets includes any PM fund with a strategy of Infrastructure, Natural Resources, or Real Estate.
DM Buyout – Includes any buyout fund that is primarily investing in developed markets of North America, Western Europe and Global.
VC/Growth – Includes all funds with a strategy of venture capital or growth equity.
Natural Resources – An investment strategy that invests in companies involved in the extraction, refinement, or distribution of natural resources.
Infrastructure – An investment strategy that invests in physical systems involved in the distribution of people, goods, and resources.
MSCI World Index – The MSCI World Index tracks large and mid-cap equity performance in developed market countries.
BofAML High Yield Index – The BofAML High Yield index tracks the performance of below investment grade U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market.
MSCI World Energy Sector Index – The MSCI World Energy Sector Index measures the performance of securities classified in the GICS Energy sector.
DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Index – The DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Index is designed to measure the performance of companies globally that are operators of pure-play infrastructure assets.
The information contained in this presentation may include forward-looking statements regarding returns, performance, opinions, the fund presented or its portfolio companies, or other events contained herein. Forward-looking statements include a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors beyond our control, or the control of the fund or the portfolio companies, which may result in material differences in actual results, performance or other expectations. The opinions, estimates and analyses reflect our current judgment, which may change in the future.
All opinions, estimates and forecasts of future performance or other events contained herein are based on information available to Hamilton Lane as of the date of this presentation and are subject to change. Past performance of the investments described herein is not indicative of future results. In addition, nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be a prediction of future performance. The information included in this presentation has not been reviewed or audited by independent public accountants. Certain information included herein has been obtained from sources that Hamilton Lane believes to be reliable, but the accuracy of such information cannot be guaranteed.
This presentation is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy, any security or to enter into any agreement with Hamilton Lane or any of its affiliates. Any such offering will be made only at your request. We do not intend that any public offering will be made by us at any time with respect to any potential transaction discussed in this presentation. Any offering or potential transaction will be made pursuant to separate documentation negotiated between us, which will supersede entirely the information contained herein.
Certain of the performance results included herein do not reflect the deduction of any applicable advisory or management fees, since it is not possible to allocate such fees accurately in a vintage year presentation or in a composite measured at different points in time. A client’s rate of return will be reduced by any applicable advisory or management fees, carried interest and any expenses incurred. Hamilton Lane’s fees are described in Part 2 of our Form ADV, a copy of which is available upon request.
The following hypothetical example illustrates the effect of fees on earned returns for both separate accounts and fund-of-funds investment vehicles. The example is solely for illustration purposes and is not intended as a guarantee or prediction of the actual returns that would be earned by similar investment vehicles having comparable features. The example is as follows: The hypothetical separate account or fund-of-funds consisted of $100 million in commitments with a fee structure of 1.0% on committed capital during the first four years of the term of the investment and then declining by 10% per year thereafter for the 12-year life of the account. The commitments were made during the first three years in relatively equal increments and the assumption of returns was based on cash flow assumptions derived from a historical database of actual private equity cash flows. Hamilton Lane modeled the impact of fees on four different return streams over a 12-year time period. In these examples, the effect of the fees reduced returns by approximately 2%. This does not include performance fees, since the performance of the account would determine the effect such fees would have on returns. Expenses also vary based on the particular investment vehicle and, therefore, were not included in this hypothetical example. Both performance fees and expenses would further decrease the return.
Hamilton Lane (Germany) GmbH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hamilton Lane Advisors, L.L.C. Hamilton Lane (Germany) GmbH is authorised and regulated by the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin). In the European Economic Area this communication is directed solely at persons who would be classified as professional investors within the meaning of Directive 2011/61/EU (AIFMD). Its contents are not directed at, may not be suitable for and should not be relied upon by retail clients.
Hamilton Lane (UK) Limited is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hamilton Lane Advisors, L.L.C. Hamilton Lane (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). In the United Kingdom this communication is directed solely at persons who would be classified as a professional client or eligible counterparty under the FCA Handbook of Rules and Guidance. Its contents are not directed at, may not be suitable for and should not be relied upon by retail clients.
Hamilton Lane Advisors, L.L.C. is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence under the Corporations Act 2001 in respect of the financial services by operation of ASIC Class Order 03/1100: U.S. SEC regulated financial service providers. Hamilton Lane Advisors, L.L.C. is regulated by the SEC under U.S. laws, which differ from Australian laws. The PDS and target market determination for the Hamilton Lane Global Private Assets Fund (AUD) can be obtained by calling 02 9293 7950 or visiting our website www.hamiltonlane.com.au.
Any tables, graphs or charts relating to past performance included in this presentation are intended only to illustrate the performance of the indices, composites, specific accounts or funds referred to for the historical periods shown. Such tables, graphs and charts are not intended to predict future performance and should not be used as the basis for an investment decision.
The information herein is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. You should consult your accounting, legal, tax or other advisors about the matters discussed herein.
The calculations contained in this document are made by Hamilton Lane based on information provided by the general partner (e.g. cash flows and valuations), and have not been prepared, reviewed or approved by the general partners.
This material is being issued by Hamilton Lane (UK) Limited (DIFC Branch) (''Hamilton Lane DIFC''). Hamilton Lane DIFC is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (''DFSA''). This document is intended for Professional Clients and Market Counterparties only as defined by the DFSA and no other person should act upon it.
In some instances, this presentation may be distributed by MPW Capital Advisors Limited (“MPW”) on behalf of Hamilton Lane and is for informational purposes only. MPW is incorporated in the Abu Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”) and is authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (“FSRA”)”. Nothing contained in this presentation constitutes investment, legal or tax advice. Neither the information, nor any opinion contained in this presentation constitutes a solicitation or offer by MPW, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments or products. Decisions based on information contained on this presentation are the sole responsibility of the visitor. No guarantee, representation, undertaking, warranty, advice or opinion, express or implied, is given by MPW or their respective directors, officers, partners, shareholders or members or employees or agents as to the accuracy, authenticity or completeness of the information or opinions contained on this presentation and no liability is accepted by such persons for the accuracy, authenticity or completeness of any such information or opinions. Important risk factors that could impact our ability to deliver the services include, among others, the following: developments and changes in laws and regulations, including increased regulation of the financial services industry through legislative action and revised rules and standards applied by regulators. Furthermore, any opinions are subject to change and may be superseded without notice.
This presentation is intended only for Professional Clients or Market Counterparties (as defined by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority) and no other Person should act upon it.